Connecting your organisation’s data to a site or app just got a lot faster.
Instead of adding apps, positions, projects, supplier, capabilities and business processes one by one via the user interface, you can now select and link multiple records to a site or app in a single action.
What you can add in bulk:
- Apps — link multiple applications to a site at once
- Positions — select individual positions, or use position groups to add an entire set in one go
- Projects — associate multiple active or planned initiatives simultaneously
- Business processes — add processes directly, or select via a parent process to capture related sub-processes together
Why it matters:
Setting up a new site or app— or keeping an existing one up to date — no longer means clicking through record after record. Whether you’re onboarding a newly acquired location, reflecting a restructure, or simply doing a data refresh, bulk association cuts the time and effort significantly while reducing the risk of missing records.
The result is a site or app profile that’s complete, accurate, and ready to use — without the administrative overhead that usually comes with it.
Project Category
Not every organisation thinks about projects the same way. Some group by priority. Others by department, owner, or strategic focus area. Until now, MOS gave you the projects — but not the lens to view them through.
Project Categories change that. Define your own groupings, structure your portfolio the way your organisation actually works, and instantly cut through the noise when it matters most.
Capability Category
When MOS was first built, capabilities meant one thing: Enterprise Architecture business capabilities. Structured. Formal. EA-defined.
But that’s not how our customers actually used them.
In practice, capabilities became the go-to place for capturing certification information, product categories, service offerings, and more — things that matter to the business but never had a natural home elsewhere.
So we made it official. Capability Categories give you the flexibility to define what a capability actually means in your organisation — without forcing everything through an EA lens. Less rigidity. Fewer dependencies. More room to capture what’s actually valuable.
App Icons
A name on a list. Or something you actually recognise.
When you’re managing dozens of applications across sites, countries, and teams, a plain text list starts to blur. Salesforce. SAP. Zendesk. ServiceNow. They’re all just words until you’ve clicked into them.
Application icons change that. One glance and you know exactly what you’re looking at — no reading required. It’s a small change that makes navigating your application landscape noticeably faster, especially when the list is long and the pressure is on.
Introduction of Priority flag
Not everything is equally important. Now MOS knows that too.
In any organisation managing a complex technology landscape, not all apps carry the same weight. Not all projects deserve the same attention. Not all integrations are equally critical to keep the lights on.
But until now, MOS treated everything the same — a flat list with no signal for what truly matters.
The Priority Flag changes that. A single, clear marker across your apps, integrations, projects, capabilities, and business processes that tells you — and everyone else — what needs attention, what’s critical, and what can wait. No more digging through records to figure out what matters most. The signal is right there, exactly where you need it.
Adding Employee range
Not every site has an org chart. That shouldn’t stop you from knowing its scale.
In an ideal world, every site in MOS has a full position structure — every role mapped, every team defined, every headcount accounted for. But that’s not always the reality, especially for recently acquired locations, smaller sites, or organisations still building out their data foundations.
Without a position structure, sites felt incomplete. And incomplete sites make it harder to assess change impact, plan resource allocation, or understand the true scale of what a project is touching.
The employee range estimate fixes that gap. A simple, manually entered indicator that gives every site a sense of scale — even before the full structure exists. Small enough to not require a full HR data exercise. Useful enough to inform decisions around revenue context, change impact, and operational planning.
Because sometimes a rough picture is infinitely better than no picture at all.
